Should museums be free? The Met has countered that its policy has been in place for more than 40 years. On the other hand they need a way to disencourage free riders and non-art lovers crooks or people just killing their time from making their premises, their own living space. I think that a small entrance fee could serve both targets. Nazi Germany also points to the dangers of allowing politicians control over interpretations of national identity and presentations of other cultures.
At a museum a visitor can choose what to see and for how long they wish to study it; television is a much more passive medium making the viewer dependent upon the interests and interpretation of the producer - it is likely to present sensationalist and controversial material in a bid for ratings, for example. Nor can a two-dimensional medium compare to viewing an object, even a flat painting, from many different angles, or even handling it, in a museum.
Today television plays a much greater role in transmitting our cultural heritage and a sense of national identity. Usually free to the viewer, it reaches into almost every home, both rich and poor.
It is a far more effective way of reaching a mass public than expensively subsidising every museum on the off-chance that people will enthusiastically flock to them. Children may have free entry at many museums, but parents are often charged high prices, deterring family visits, especially from the poor and from those families who do not prize education so highly.
Again, this is an equal opportunity issue, being one of the reasons why middle-class children outperform their less-privileged peers academically. Sure, I can afford the admission fee now, but the idea that out-of-towners or even just those from the next state over will suddenly have to choose between visiting that marvelous old museum or doing something a little more wallet-friendly is a tragedy to me.
Anyone can step inside them, on any given day. It educates us, opens our eyes and, ultimately, makes us better humans. The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York announced that it is ending its universal pay-what-you-wish admissions policy. The Philadelphia Museum of Art, pictured here, should be fighting to expand its free hours. Inquirer Morning Newsletter. The fact only thing I would like it was a great day to day I and I have don't have to go back to and I don't know what I was just a few weeks and the rest is history is not an easy to use play it for the first place I in the first time since.
Google Search. Post Your Opinion. Create New Poll. Sign In Sign Up. Add a New Topic. Last month, DAM made itself free for everyone under the age of 18, following a similar move by the Museum of Contemporary Art Denver in This year, the Clyfford Still Museum went free on Fridays from 5 to 8 p. The Dallas Art Museum went free in They want a city collection that gets city funding to be free.
Like the library. Eliminating the barrier to entry is less an economic decision than a moral one, Vikan said. Among those donors were the William G. Baker, Jr.Jamie and Kent agree, Julia doesn't agree with us. Kent thinks museum is very educational. Jamie drew a picture of a chicken on the white board. Thank museumms very much. Paying a lot of money to go to some place full of old stuff amityville the awakening full movie online free watch not a good idea when you can go to your basement instead because there is probably a ton of old stuff down there and if that is not al, enough for you try the all museums should be free to the public. I think that museums should be free for young people. They give young people the opportunity to not only enjoy arts puublic also learn value of culture. Generally, In Japan, most students learn various cultures by only reading textbook at school. However, it's very important for them to understand cultures "directly". By appreciating arts directly, it's possible pblic students to get something that textbook can't give them. For that reason, I agree that museums should be free. Museums all museums should be free to the public not only enjoyment; they are education, and as such, should be free. While I can appreciate the enormous costs involved in maintaining and obtaining collections, let the wealthiest one-percent of the country pay for it. The Met in NYC is technically all museums should be free to the public they ask you to give what all museums should be free to the public can afford. But the idea of a person or child interested in art, not being yhe to view it because of cost, is morally wrong. All museums should be free because — regardless of institutional intentions — when they are free we can use them in ways that better fit our. Knowledge and art, like air, should be free to all. Yes, I understand the argument that museums could, and should, be treated like public. The Met attracts some six million visitors per year, all of whom encounter a the other camp believes museums should be free community resources. whereby members of the public participate in membership programs to. Museums, by their very nature, are meant to educated the general public. They are supposed to be places for schools to come on field trips, families to visit, and. sud-ouest-tai-chi-chuan.org › /01 › met-museums-new-admission-policy-why. With Admission Fees, the Question Is: What Should a Museum Be? California museums that will hold its 13th annual “Museums Free-for-All” on The Minneapolis Institute of Art, however, is free to the public and has been. I think that museums should be free for young people. They give young people I think art exhibits should be free for the public. They do it all the time. Wealth. A common refrain is that the museum can “afford” to have free admission for all, either through better management of costs, or through. In an ideal world the answer would be yes, keep museums free for all. Currently, the national museums in London remain free to the public and have been since April Is this a system that all museums should adopt? No one asks for identification or, best of all, makes you pay. Would you go to your city's museum more often, or bring friends when they visit from. This philanthropy is linked to a desire to make a difference, so it is unlikely to be strong when the government is seen as the source of all funding — it is most advanced in the USA for example, where government funding is very limited compared to other developed countries. Among them would be strong government grant programmes for the arts, more private donations and a revived culture of philanthropy, whereby members of the public participate in membership programs to support cultural institutions. Of the museums surveyed by the paper, nearly half do not charge general admission. So then financial situation does not matter, and anyone can visit a museum. Thank you very much. Jamie and Kent agree, Julia doesn't agree with us. A better option is to charge fees for regular visitors but provide free tickets as prizes for high-achieving students and others who are likely to appreciate the reward. But in smaller cities across the U. Get the news you need to start your day. Paying a lot of money to go to some place full of old stuff is not a good idea when you can go to your basement instead because there is probably a ton of old stuff down there and if that is not good enough for you try the attic. Here in Philadelphia, we have an unparalleled tradition of making the artifacts of history, art, and science free for everyone. The government can do that! Some museums do it already. Museums are a crucial source of inspiration and education for our increasingly important creative industries e.